Watching this resources will notify you when proposed changes or new versions are created so you can keep track of improvements that have been made.
Favoriting this resource allows you to save it in the “My Resources” tab of your account. There, you can easily access this resource later when you’re ready to customize it or assign it to your students.
The continuity theory proposes that older adults maintain the same activities, behaviors, personalities, and relationships of the past.
Examine the pros and cons of the continuity theory of aging, specifically in terms of how it neglects to consider social institutions or chronically ill adults
Internal structures of continuity remain constant over a lifetime and include elements, such as personality traits, ideas, and beliefs. It helps people make future decisions by providing them with a stable foundation in the past.
External structures of continuity help maintain a stable self-concept and lifestyle and include relationships and social roles.
George L. Maddox and Robert Atchley are most closely associated with the continuity theory.
The theory is criticized for including a distinction between normal and pathological aging that does not take into account elderly people with chronic diseases. The theory is also criticized for not considering the influence of social institutions on the aging of individuals.
The Internal and External Structures of Continuity
Older adults hold on to many of the beliefs, practices, and relationships they had in the past as they continue to age.
The internal structure of an individual - for instance, an individual's personality traits - remains relatively constant throughout a person's lifetime. Other internal aspects such as beliefs can remain relatively constant as well, though are also subject to change. This internal structure facilitates future decision-making by providing the individual with a strong internal foundation of the past. The external structure of an individual consists of relationships and social roles, and it supports the maintenance of a stable self-concept and lifestyle.
George L. Maddox and Robert Atchley are most closely associated with the continuity theory. Maddox provided an empirical description of the continuity theory in 1968 in a chapter of the book Middle Age and Aging: A Reader in Social Psychology called "Persistence of Lifestyle among the Elderly: A Longitudinal Study of Patterns of Social Activity in Relation to Life Satisfaction. " In 1971, Atchley formally proposed the theory in his article "Retirement and Leisure Participation: Continuity or Crisis? " He continued to expound upon the theory over the years, explaining the development of internal and external structures in 1989 and publishing a book in 1999 called Continuity and Adaptation in Aging: Creating Positive Experiences.
The theory is criticized primarily for its definition of normal aging. The theory distinguishes between normal aging and pathological aging, so it neglects older adults who suffer from chronic illness. The theory also fails to explain how social institutions impact individuals and the way they age.
People continue to grow and change as they age, becoming completely different people by the time they die., Social roles and relationships play no part in a person's life or decisions as they age., People who age continue end up self-destructing because of pressure and stress from society., and Normal aging adults maintain the same activities, behaviors and personality traits throughout their lifetime.